[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317196305.5781.5.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:51:45 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, arve@...roid.com,
markgross@...gnar.org, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
amit.kucheria@...aro.org, farrowg@...ibm.com,
"Dmitry Fink (Palm GBU)" <Dmitry.Fink@...m.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, khilman@...com,
Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>, mjg@...hat.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Proposal for optimistic suspend idea.
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 15:56 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> Sure, and real-time tasks should coordinate with all of userland to just
> make sure no one gets in the way! And those applications should respect
> that! Why is all that *useless* code in the kernel!? :)
In fact they should, its impossible to develop two sets of real-time
applications and shove them on the same box without co-ordination.
SCHED_FIFO is an utter trainwreck, you're talking to the guy who gave a
conference talk on why SCHED_FIFO sucks.
The only reason we have SCHED_FIFO is because of POSIX, and its one of
those things where they fucked up worse than usual (mostly because
people often don't realize how broken it is).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists