linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5]: Improve performance of LZO hibernation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1317196836.1998.29.camel@shrek.rexursive.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:00:36 +1000
From:	Bojan Smojver <bojan@...ursive.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5]: Improve performance of LZO hibernation

On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 10:48 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Yes, the threads are stopped. What happens after that? Will the
> hibernation process be aborted? How can this be tested?

Oh, I didn't answer the other possibility - that we stopped the threads
form hibernation code. This is what we want. Compression/decompression
threads stop on our request (i.e. not an error). We continue with the
process, because there is no more data to compress/decompress.

-- 
Bojan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/