linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 -mm] limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:02:16 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	aarcange@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -mm] limit direct reclaim for higher order allocations

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:52:46AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> When suffering from memory fragmentation due to unfreeable pages,
> THP page faults will repeatedly try to compact memory.  Due to
> the unfreeable pages, compaction fails.
> 
> Needless to say, at that point page reclaim also fails to create
> free contiguous 2MB areas.  However, that doesn't stop the current
> code from trying, over and over again, and freeing a minimum of
> 4MB (2UL << sc->order pages) at every single invocation.
> 
> This resulted in my 12GB system having 2-3GB free memory, a
> corresponding amount of used swap and very sluggish response times.
> 
> This can be avoided by having the direct reclaim code not reclaim
> from zones that already have plenty of free memory available for
> compaction.
> 
> If compaction still fails due to unmovable memory, doing additional
> reclaim will only hurt the system, not help.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> 

Because this patch improves things;

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>

That said, shrink_zones potentially returns having scanning
and reclaimed 0 pages. We still fall through to shrink_slab and
because we are reclaiming 0 pages, we loop over all priorities in
do_try_to_free_pages() and potentially even call wait_iff_congested. I
think this patch would be better if shrink_zones() returned true if
we did not reclaim because compaction was ready and returned early
from shrink_zones.

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 117eb4d..ead9c94 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2061,14 +2061,19 @@ restart:
  *
  * If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
  * scan then give up on it.
+ *
+ * This function returns true if a zone is being reclaimed for a high-order
+ * allocation that will use compaction and compaction is ready to begin. This
+ * indicates to the caller that further reclaim is unnecessary.
  */
-static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
+static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 					struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	struct zoneref *z;
 	struct zone *zone;
 	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
 	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
+	bool abort_reclaim_compaction = false;
 
 	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
 					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
@@ -2090,8 +2095,10 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 				 */
 				if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER &&
 					(compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order) ||
-					 compaction_deferred(zone)))
+					 compaction_deferred(zone))) {
+					abort_reclaim_compaction = true;
 					continue;
+				}
 			}
 			/*
 			 * This steals pages from memory cgroups over softlimit
@@ -2110,6 +2117,8 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 
 		shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
 	}
+
+	return abort_reclaim_compaction;
 }
 
 static bool zone_reclaimable(struct zone *zone)
@@ -2174,7 +2183,8 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 		sc->nr_scanned = 0;
 		if (!priority)
 			disable_swap_token(sc->mem_cgroup);
-		shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
+		if (shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc))
+			break;
 		/*
 		 * Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
 		 * over limit cgroups
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/