[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110928095826.eb8ebc8c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:58:26 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <paul@...lmenage.org>,
<lizf@...fujitsu.com>, <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <gthelen@...gle.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<kirill@...temov.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory
Controller
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:18:39 -0300
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
> On 09/26/2011 07:34 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:56:39 -0300
> > Glauber Costa<glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
"If parent sets use_hierarchy==1, children must have the same kmem_independent value
> > with parant's one."
> >
> > How do you think ? I think a hierarchy must have the same config.
> BTW, Kame:
>
> Look again (I forgot myself when I first replied to you)
> Only in the root cgroup those files get registered.
> So shouldn't be a problem, because children won't even
> be able to see them.
>
> Do you agree with this ?
>
agreed.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists