[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYx-iKPJisP7PgNynu9z3tu7s6KieFAoAOU2YO_5X2iqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:58:50 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Linaro Dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v7] pinmux: add a driver for the U300 pinmux
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com> wrote:
> But can't debugfs just get its information from the device name field in
> the mapping table? I'm not sure why the need to use that information for
> debugfs prevents the having entries with both the hog flag set and a
> device name set?
That feels unsafe - then you have some string claiming to represent the
device for that pinmux, but the system has not matched that string
against dev_name() for any real device, so it could be a lie, any string
like "foo" would do.
What I do now for U300 is complete resolution by matching dev_name
in the mapping to dev_name(device) on the struct device * actually
instantiated, which means you're 100% sure it is really mapped
to that very device.
I like this since it's much more stringent...
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists