linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 05/24] C6X: build infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201109281523.15680.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:23:15 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/24] C6X: build infrastructure

On Tuesday 27 September 2011, Mark Salter wrote:
> +comment "Board Selection"
> +choice
> +       prompt "Board"
> +       help
> +         This option specifies the specific board for which the kernel will be
> +         compiled.
> +
> +config BOARD_DSK6455
> +       bool "DSK6455"
> +       select SOC_TMS320C6455
> +
> +config BOARD_EVM6457
> +       bool "EVM6472"
> +       select SOC_TMS320C6457
> +
> +config BOARD_EVM6472
> +       bool "EVM6472"
> +       select SOC_TMS320C6472
> +
> +config BOARD_EVM6474
> +       bool "EVM6474"
> +       select SOC_TMS320C6474
> +
> +endchoice

This really wants to be a flat list instead of a "choice" statement,
so you can build a kernel for multiple boards at once. Is there a
reason why this is not possible right now?

Also, how different are these boards and socs still? Since you are
based on device trees for hardware configuration, do you actually
need the options at all?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/