linux-kernel - Re: [RFD 3/9] Display /proc/stat information per cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:14:50 -0300
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <paul@...lmenage.org>,
	<lizf@...fujitsu.com>, <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
	<jbottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD 3/9] Display /proc/stat information per cgroup

On 09/27/2011 06:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 19:20 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> +static inline void task_cgroup_account_field(struct task_struct *p,
>> +                                            cputime64_t tmp, int index)
>> +{
>> +       struct kernel_stat *kstat;
>> +       struct task_group *tg = task_group(p);
>> +
>> +       do {
>> +               kstat = this_cpu_ptr(tg->cpustat);
>> +               kstat->cpustat[index] = cputime64_add(kstat->cpustat[index],
>> +                                                     tmp);
>
> So aside from the cputime64_t nonsense you could actually write that as:
>
> 		__this_cpu_add(tg->cpustat[index], tmp);
>
> which should yield better asm I think, a quick grep seems to confirm
> cputime64_t is indeed a u64 all over so its fair to just ignore that.

Ok, It would indeed be better.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/