[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110928155539.GA10550@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:55:39 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Q: x86: add context tag to mark mm when running a task in
32-bit compatibility mode
On 09/27, Al Viro wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 07:04:48PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > --- x/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> > +++ x/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> > @@ -502,10 +502,6 @@ void set_personality_64bit(void)
> > /* Make sure to be in 64bit mode */
> > clear_thread_flag(TIF_IA32);
> >
> > - /* Ensure the corresponding mm is not marked. */
> > - if (current->mm)
> > - current->mm->context.ia32_compat = 0;
>
> What happens when 32bit task does exec on 64bit binary?
Nothing. This bit is always zero after init_mm(), it can't copy
MMF_COMPAT.
But. This is wrong anyway. I forgot about fork(). We do not want to
uglify copy_mm(), MMF_INIT_MASK should include MMF_COMPAT and then
set_personality_64bit() needs to clear this bit.
Thanks!
> > - if (current->mm)
> > - current->mm->context.ia32_compat = 1;
> > + set_bit(MMF_COMPAT, ¤t->mm->flags);
>
> ... assuming current->mm is never NULL here.
Yes, but it can't be NULL?
SET_PERSONALITY() can only be called during exec, and it must be called
after exec_mmap() has already installed the new mm != NULL, otherwise
the current code is buggy anyway.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists