linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm/tegra: device tree support for ventana board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:33:21 -0700
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
	Erik Gilling <konkers@...roid.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm/tegra: device tree support for ventana board

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 September 2011, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c
>> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
>>
>>  void harmony_pinmux_init(void);
>>  void seaboard_pinmux_init(void);
>> -
>> +void ventana_pinmux_init(void);
>>
>>  struct of_dev_auxdata tegra20_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
>>         OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-sdhci", TEGRA_SDMMC1_BASE, "sdhci-tegra.0", NULL),
>> @@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ static void __init tegra_dt_init(void)
>>                 harmony_pinmux_init();
>>         else if (of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,seaboard"))
>>                 seaboard_pinmux_init();
>> +       else if (of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,ventana"))
>> +               ventana_pinmux_init();
>
> Are you (Peter, Colin, Olof) confident that this is not getting out
> of hand before it's getting better?
>
> If we are keeping the per-board pinmux configuration in the kernel
> for longer, I think it would be better to do this table-driven than
> having a list of top-level of_machine_is_compatible() statements
> and do something like:
>
> static struct {
>        const char *machine;
>        struct tegra_pingroup_config *config[];
> } pinmux_configs[] __initdata = {
>        { "nvidia,ventana", &ventana_pinmux },
>        { "nvidia,seaboard, &seaboard_pinmux },
> };

That is definitely a nicer solution. I didn't see a strong need to
switch to that model now since it should hopefully be a temporary
thing, but given Stephen's mention of Cardhu, I think it does make
sense.

Peter, care to respin this patch with the above solution instead?
Also, please print a warning if no match is found.


Thanks,

-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/