linux-kernel - Re: [RFD 1/9] Change cpustat fields to an array.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E837DBE.5010904@parallels.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:04:14 -0300
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <paul@...lmenage.org>,
	<lizf@...fujitsu.com>, <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
	<jbottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD 1/9] Change cpustat fields to an array.

On 09/28/2011 04:09 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 15:19 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> On 09/27/2011 06:00 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 19:20 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>>    /* Must have preemption disabled for this to be meaningful. */
>>>> -#define kstat_this_cpu __get_cpu_var(kstat)
>>>> +#define kstat_this_cpu this_cpu_ptr(task_group_kstat(current))
>>>
>>> This just lost you a debug check, the former would whinge when called
>>> without preemption, the new one wont. Its part of the this_cpu feature
>>> set to make debugging impossible.
>>>
>>>> +#else
>>>> +#define kstat_cpu(cpu) per_cpu(kstat, cpu)
>>>> +#define kstat_this_cpu (&__get_cpu_var(kstat))
>>>> +#endif
>>>>
>>>>    extern unsigned long long nr_context_switches(void);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -52,8 +62,8 @@ struct irq_desc;
>>>>    static inline void kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(unsigned int irq,
>>>>                                               struct irq_desc *desc)
>>>>    {
>>>> -       __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs[irq]);
>>>> -       __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs_sum);
>>>> +       kstat_this_cpu->irqs[irq]++;
>>>> +       kstat_this_cpu->irqs_sum++;
>>>
>>> It might be worth looking at the asm output of that, I think you made it
>>> worse, but I'm not quite sure how smart gcc is, it might just figure out
>>> what you meant.
>>
>> I'd say leave it alone.
>> The biggest difference is that we don't have access to task_group(), or
>> any of the fields in struct task_group. Because of that, we end up
>> having to export a function to do the job of dealing with it.
>>
>> Users inside sched.c won't have this problem. Outside of it, we'll add a
>> call to some paths. True, mostly handle_irq paths, but I don't think
>> that's what's going to kill us.
>>
>> Now if we really really want to save it, we'd have to move struct
>> task_group and its friends to a more visible location like a header...
>
> I'm not quite getting how task_group is relevant here.
>
> The above will do something like:
>
> 	mov gs:$per-cpu-offset-of-kstat, reg
> 	inc reg + idx*8

except offset of kstat is not fixed. It is dynamic allocated, so you have
to calculate it. You can't really do it without knowing at least the 
address of task_group, and then, the offset of kstat inside it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/