linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] C6X: New architecture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22021.1317246541@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:49:01 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] C6X: New architecture

On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:29:41 EDT, Mark Salter said:

> This architecture supports members of the Texas Instruments family
> of C6x single and multicore DSPs. The multicore DSPs do not support
> cache coherancy, so are not suitable for SMP.

Is there a usage model for the multicore? I know somebody had some patches for
"HPC dedicated compute cores" that would just basically run a userspace process
and that's it - would those be applicable here?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped