linux-kernel - [185/244] tcp: fix validation of D-SACK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110928220144.846430459@clark.kroah.org>
Date:	Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:02:29 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [185/244] tcp: fix validation of D-SACK

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------


From: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>

[ Upstream commit f779b2d60ab95c17f1e025778ed0df3ec2f05d75 ]

D-SACK is allowed to reside below snd_una. But the corresponding check
in tcp_is_sackblock_valid() is the exact opposite. It looks like a typo.

Signed-off-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static int tcp_is_sackblock_valid(struct
 		return 0;
 
 	/* ...Then it's D-SACK, and must reside below snd_una completely */
-	if (!after(end_seq, tp->snd_una))
+	if (after(end_seq, tp->snd_una))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (!before(start_seq, tp->undo_marker))


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/