linux-kernel - [103/244] [SCSI] isci: fix 32-bit operation when CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:01:07 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: [103/244] [SCSI] isci: fix 32-bit operation when CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=n

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>

commit ee33e2b771f9e9e4aaba2bb2ace7b727fe451a8b upstream.

The unsolicited frame control infrastructure requires a table of dma
addresses for the hardware to lookup the frame buffer location by an
index.  The hardware expects the elements of this table to be 64-bit
quantities, so we cannot reference these elements as dma_addr_t.  All
unsolicited frame protocols are affected, particularly SATA-PIO and SMP
which prevented direct-attached SATA drives and expander-attached drives
to not be discovered.

Reported-by: Jacek Danecki <jacek.danecki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 drivers/scsi/isci/unsolicited_frame_control.c |    2 +-
 drivers/scsi/isci/unsolicited_frame_control.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/unsolicited_frame_control.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/unsolicited_frame_control.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ int sci_unsolicited_frame_control_constr
 	 */
 	buf_len = SCU_MAX_UNSOLICITED_FRAMES * SCU_UNSOLICITED_FRAME_BUFFER_SIZE;
 	header_len = SCU_MAX_UNSOLICITED_FRAMES * sizeof(struct scu_unsolicited_frame_header);
-	size = buf_len + header_len + SCU_MAX_UNSOLICITED_FRAMES * sizeof(dma_addr_t);
+	size = buf_len + header_len + SCU_MAX_UNSOLICITED_FRAMES * sizeof(uf_control->address_table.array[0]);
 
 	/*
 	 * The Unsolicited Frame buffers are set at the start of the UF
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/unsolicited_frame_control.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/unsolicited_frame_control.h
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ struct sci_uf_address_table_array {
 	 * starting address of the UF address table.
 	 * 64-bit pointers are required by the hardware.
 	 */
-	dma_addr_t *array;
+	u64 *array;
 
 	/**
 	 * This field specifies the physical address location for the UF


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/