[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF1ivSbPoC_ngCmwmTC+JJuNxhhSoJyCRhTRcWj9V9VgYwU9jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:02:36 +0800
From: Lin Ming <mlin@...pku.edu.cn>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: add barrier to prevent evictable page in
unevictable list
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:04:05PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
>> > When racing between putback_lru_page and shmem_unlock happens,
>>
>> s/shmem_unlock/shmem_lock/
>
> I did it intentionally for represent shmem_lock with user = 1, lock = 0.
> If you think it makes others confusing, I will change in next version.
> Thanks.
I was confused. Now I understand.
>
>>
>> > progrom execution order is as follows, but clear_bit in processor #1
>> > could be reordered right before spin_unlock of processor #1.
>> > Then, the page would be stranded on the unevictable list.
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists