[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317301641.2676.120.camel@smile>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:07:21 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] fat: don't use custom hex_to_bin()
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 08:15 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> writes:
>
> > Actually here we will change endianess.
> > So, my question is what endianess is right here? If the original code
> > okay, then patch should be rewritten like this:
> >
> > rc = hex2bin(op++, ip + 3, 1);
> > if (rc < 0)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > rc = hex2bin(op++, ip + 1, 1);
> > if (rc < 0)
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> Original code may work only for little endian. Well, anyway, the output
> should be wchar_t (u16) of native endian.
> So, I think it should be something like
>
> u8 uc[2];
> if (hex2bin(uc, ip + 1, 2) < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> *(wchar_t *)op = uc[0] << 8 | uc[1];
> This should be readable more.
It might be so, but it's not okay to do such constructions in C
fs/fat/namei_vfat.c:535:1: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations
and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
So, I will resend patch as I proposed with additional comments.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists