[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKPcRGpPG2Z_tMQFHz8fpBLhLO4dx58AVhYWmPdZ_0pV7pVK6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:56:43 +0200
From: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com>
To: Barry Song <Barry.Song@....com>
Cc: pavel@....cz, rjw@...k.pl, frank.hofmann@...tom.com,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
workgroup.linux@....com, Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: HIBERNATION: add resume_wait param to support
MMC-like devices as resume file
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Barry Song <Barry.Song@....com> wrote:
>> From: Barry Song <baohua.song@....com>
>>
>> Some devices like mmc are async detected very slow. For example,
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c launchs a 200ms delayed work to detect
>> mmc partitions then add disk.
>>
>> we do have wait_for_device_probe and scsi_complete_async_scans
>> before calling swsusp_check, but it is not enough to wait mmc.
>>
>> This patch adds resumewait kernel param just like rootwait so
>> that we have enough time to wait mmc ready. The differene is
>> here we wait for resume partition but rootwait waits for rootfs
>> partition.
>
> I assume that such a device would need "rootwait" to boot in the first
> place; why don't you "overload" the param to also enable waiting in
> the resume path?
And in case that makes sense, it might be worthwhile to refactor a
common helper to be also used in do_mounts.c, e.g.
dev_t wait_for_device(char *name)
L
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists