[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANN689H1G-USQYQrOTb47Hrc7KMjLdxkppYCDKsTUy5WhuRs7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:25:00 -0700
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Michael Wolf <mjwolf@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] V2: idle page tracking / working set estimation
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net> wrote:
> I have been trying to test these patches since yesterday afternoon. When my
> machine is idle, they behave fine. I started looking at performance to make
> sure they were a big regression by testing kernel builds with the scanner
> disabled, and then enabled (set to 120 seconds). The scanner disabled builds
> work fine, but with the scanner enabled the second time I build my kernel hangs
> my machine every time. Unfortunately, I do not have any more information than
> that for you at the moment. My next step is to try the same tests in qemu to
> see if I can get more state information when the kernel hangs.
Could you please send me your .config file ? Also, did you apply the
patches on top of straight v3.0 and what is your machine like ?
Thanks,
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists