[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1317330064-28893-7-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:01:00 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 06/10] mm: memcg: remove optimization of keeping the root_mem_cgroup LRU lists empty
root_mem_cgroup, lacking a configurable limit, was never subject to
limit reclaim, so the pages charged to it could be kept off its LRU
lists. They would be found on the global per-zone LRU lists upon
physical memory pressure and it made sense to avoid uselessly linking
them to both lists.
The global per-zone LRU lists are about to go away on memcg-enabled
kernels, with all pages being exclusively linked to their respective
per-memcg LRU lists. As a result, pages of the root_mem_cgroup must
also be linked to its LRU lists again. This is purely about the LRU
list, root_mem_cgroup is still not charged.
The overhead is temporary until the double-LRU scheme is going away
completely.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 12 ++----------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 21468e2..8b2af55 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -958,8 +958,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc->mem_cgroup, page);
/* huge page split is done under lru_lock. so, we have no races. */
MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) -= 1 << compound_order(page);
- if (mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup))
- return;
VM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&pc->lru));
list_del_init(&pc->lru);
}
@@ -984,13 +982,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page)
return;
pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
- /* unused or root page is not rotated. */
+ /* unused page is not rotated. */
if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
return;
/* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */
smp_rmb();
- if (mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup))
- return;
mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc->mem_cgroup, page);
list_move_tail(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]);
}
@@ -1004,13 +1000,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_rotate_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
return;
pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
- /* unused or root page is not rotated. */
+ /* unused page is not rotated. */
if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
return;
/* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */
smp_rmb();
- if (mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup))
- return;
mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc->mem_cgroup, page);
list_move(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]);
}
@@ -1042,8 +1036,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
/* huge page split is done under lru_lock. so, we have no races. */
MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) += 1 << compound_order(page);
SetPageCgroupAcctLRU(pc);
- if (mem_cgroup_is_root(pc->mem_cgroup))
- return;
list_add(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]);
}
--
1.7.6.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists