[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110929235708.1bbd1166@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:57:08 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] x86 mrst: fix build error when X86_MRST is not
enabled
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:35:16 -0700
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
>
> Fix build when CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID is enabled but
> CONFIG_X86_MRST is not enabled. Fixes this build error:
This looks wrong. Unfortunately until we get kernel.org back its hard to
do much about it and see what is in all the trees.
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_MRST
>
> static inline enum mrst_cpu_type mrst_identify_cpu(void)
> {
> return __mrst_cpu_chip;
> }
>
> -#else /* !CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID */
> +#else /* !CONFIG_X86_MRST */
>
> #define mrst_identify_cpu() (0)
>
> -#endif /* !CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID */
> +#endif /* !CONFIG_X86_MRST */
This breaks Medfield so NAK
The correct behaviour should be
INTEL_MID defined -> mrst_cpu_chip has meaning
INTEL_MID not defined -> mrst_identify_chip is 0
your change makes it 0 for Medfield which means it will crash on boot.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists