[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110929165417.59fc03c7.akpm00@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:54:17 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm00@...il.com>
To: Mike Miller <mike.miller@...com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
scameron@...rdog.cce.hp.com, thenzel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH [1/1] cciss: auto engage scsi subsystem for tape support
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:32:00 -0500
Mike Miller <mike.miller@...com> wrote:
>
> commit 608b0262ce818901b931d7e6534aad375c698924
> Author: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@...rdog.cce.hp.com>
> Date: Mon Aug 29 13:27:46 2011 -0500
>
> cciss: auto engage scsi mid-layer
>
> Acked-by: Mike Miller <mike.miller@...com>
Nobody seems to have applied this to anything.
The patch has no signoffs.
The changelog is awful. What are the end-user-visible effects of this
change? How is anyone supposed to tell?
> --- a/drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c
> @@ -1720,5 +1720,6 @@ static int cciss_eh_abort_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *scsicmd)
> /* If no tape support, then these become defined out of existence */
>
> #define cciss_scsi_setup(cntl_num)
> +#define cciss_engage_scsi(h)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_CISS_SCSI_TAPE */
cciss #includes .c files? I can't believe you did that :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists