[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110930134245.GB21474@localhost.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:42:45 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Please revert "debug: Make CONFIG_EXPERT select CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL
to unhide debug options"
I was just wondering why I was asked about all the debug options when I
tried 3.1-rc8, and that was due to commit f505c553 (debug: Make
CONFIG_EXPERT select CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL to unhide debug options),
the full commit is below.
It is wrong, and the author does not seem to understand how Kconfig works.
The commit message is:
Several debugging options currently default to y, such as
CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE and CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA. Embedded users
might want to turn those options off to save space; however,
turning them off requires turning on CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL to
unhide them. Since CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL exists specifically to
unhide debugging options, and CONFIG_EXPERT exists specifically
to unhide options potentially needed by experts and/or embedded
users, make CONFIG_EXPERT automatically imply
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL.
Let me point at the obvious fact that both CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE and
CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA do depend on DEBUG_KERNEL, and are contrary to the
claim of the author of this patch never enabled with
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=n. [1]
Linus, please revert this commit.
Thanks
Adrian
[1] Select abuse would be an exception, but that doesn't seem to be
the case for these options.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists