lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110930134245.GB21474@localhost.pp.htv.fi>
Date:	Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:42:45 +0300
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Please revert "debug: Make CONFIG_EXPERT select CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL
 to unhide debug options"

I was just wondering why I was asked about all the debug options when I 
tried 3.1-rc8, and that was due to commit f505c553 (debug: Make 
CONFIG_EXPERT select CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL to unhide debug options),
the full commit is below.

It is wrong, and the author does not seem to understand how Kconfig works.

The commit message is:

    Several debugging options currently default to y, such as
    CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE and CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA.  Embedded users
    might want to turn those options off to save space; however,
    turning them off requires turning on CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL to
    unhide them.  Since CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL exists specifically to
    unhide debugging options, and CONFIG_EXPERT exists specifically
    to unhide options potentially needed by experts and/or embedded
    users, make CONFIG_EXPERT automatically imply
    CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL.


Let me point at the obvious fact that both CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE and 
CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA do depend on DEBUG_KERNEL, and are contrary to the 
claim of the author of this patch never enabled with 
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=n. [1]

Linus, please revert this commit.

Thanks
Adrian

[1] Select abuse would be an exception, but that doesn't seem to be
    the case for these options.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ