linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] signal: Add signal->ctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1317396627.12973.7.camel@twins>
Date:	Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:30:27 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Anirudh Badam <abadam@...princeton.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] signal: Add signal->ctrl_lock for job control

On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 16:12 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> +       assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
> +       assert_spin_locked(&t->signal->ctrl_lock);

There's also lockdep_assert_held(), the difference is that
assert_spin_locked() will always generate code, and only checks that the
lock is held, not that we are the current owner.

lockdep_assert_held() will only generate code for lockdep kernels and
will in fact check that the specified lock is held by the current task.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/