linux-kernel - Re: Please revert "debug: Make CONFIG_EXPERT select CONFIG_DEBUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110930155012.GC9049@localhost.pp.htv.fi>
Date:	Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:50:12 +0300
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Please revert "debug: Make CONFIG_EXPERT select
 CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL to unhide debug options"

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 08:05:19AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:42:45PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > Let me point at the obvious fact that both CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE and 
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA do depend on DEBUG_KERNEL, and are contrary to the 
> > claim of the author of this patch never enabled with 
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=n. [1]
> 
> Not true:
> 
> ~/src/linux-2.6$ rm .config
> ~/src/linux-2.6$ make allnoconfig
>   HOSTCC  scripts/basic/fixdep
>   HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/conf.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
>   HOSTLD  scripts/kconfig/conf
> scripts/kconfig/conf --allnoconfig Kconfig
> #
> # configuration written to .config
> #
> ~/src/linux-2.6$ grep BUGVERBOSE .config
> CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=y
> ~/src/linux-2.6$ grep DEBUG_KERNEL .config
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL is not set
> 
> DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE does not depend on DEBUG_KERNEL; it just only shows up
> with DEBUG_KERNEL (and EXPERT) set.  The *description* has a conditional
> on DEBUG_KERNEL and EXPERT:
> 
> config DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
>         bool "Verbose BUG() reporting (adds 70K)" if DEBUG_KERNEL && EXPERT
>...

Apologies, I was wrong on DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
(but for DEBUG_RODATA I was right).

>...
> Also see Ingo Molnar's mail with Message-Id
> <20110605093445.GA19927@...e.hu>, which explicitly recommended this
> approach.

Ingo is an expert in a gazillion areas of the kernel and knows more 
about these than mere mortals like me will ever know.

Kconfig is (the?) one thing where he in not a good advisor.

Looking at the patch Frederic points at [1]:

 config DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
-	bool "Verbose BUG() reporting (adds 70K)" if DEBUG_KERNEL && EXPERT
+	bool "Verbose BUG() reporting (adds 70K)" if EXPERT

This part of the patch would have been the correct and complete 
solution for DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE.

The crazy select added in commit f505c553 is wrong.

> - Josh Triplett

cu
Adrian

[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/6/641

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/