[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317398203.3375.25.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:56:43 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Anirudh Badam <abadam@...princeton.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] signal: Add rwlock to protect sighand->action
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 16:12 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> @@ -2935,9 +3025,11 @@ int do_sigaction(int sig, struct k_sigaction *act, struct k_sigaction *oact)
> if (!valid_signal(sig) || sig < 1 || (act && sig_kernel_only(sig)))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> + read_lock(¤t->sighand->action_lock);
> +
> k = &t->sighand->action[sig-1];
>
> - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> if (oact)
> *oact = *k;
>
> @@ -2967,6 +3059,7 @@ int do_sigaction(int sig, struct k_sigaction *act, struct k_sigaction *oact)
> }
> }
>
> + read_unlock(¤t->sighand->action_lock);
> spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> return 0;
> }
Guh! I just noticed this. That should obviously be write-locked.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists