linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] stop_machine: make stop_machine safe and efficient to call early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1317400496.4588.54.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:34:54 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] stop_machine: make stop_machine safe and efficient
 to call early

On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 09:28 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Make stop_machine() safe to call early in boot, before SMP has been
> set up, by simply calling the callback function directly if there's
> only one CPU online.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
> index ba5070c..2df15ca 100644
> --- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
> +++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
> @@ -485,6 +485,9 @@ int __stop_machine(int (*fn)(void *), void *data, const struct cpumask *cpus)
>  					    .num_threads = num_online_cpus(),
>  					    .active_cpus = cpus };
>  
> +	if (smdata.num_threads == 1)
> +		return (*fn)(data);

Doesn't interrupts need to be disabled here too? As stop machine
functions also guarantee that they will not be interrupted by
interrupts.

-- Steve

> +
>  	/* Set the initial state and stop all online cpus. */
>  	set_state(&smdata, STOPMACHINE_PREPARE);
>  	return stop_cpus(cpu_online_mask, stop_machine_cpu_stop, &smdata);
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/