[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110930170946.GF2859@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:09:46 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/21] drm/i915: Unlock PCH_PP_CONTROL always
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:09:38PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Avoid any question about locked registers by just writing the unlock
> pattern with every write to the register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
grep shows that we also write to PCH_PP_CONTROL in intel_lvds.c in the
dpms functions - any reasons these two writes are left out?
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@...ll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists