[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZxxLdJQEkG--5Uf8DX+-00yOecb_NMpf0QSpP8u5hR4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:20:56 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Linaro Dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Stijn Devriendt <highguy@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v8
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
> [Me]
>> That is not the reason it's there actually, what we have
>> discussed on the mailing list is getting sysfs entries for the same
>> reason gpiolib registers a class: handle pin control from userspace,
>>(...)
>
> Sure, but you don't need the bus yet. It can be added when it is
> actually needed. I'm not convinced that the sysfs approach is
> actually the right interface here (I'm certainly not a fan of the gpio
> sysfs i/f), and I'd rather not be putting in unneeded stuff until the
> userspace i/f is hammered out.
OK I buy that, I will post a v9 without bus...
Thanks!
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists