linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 19/21] drm/i915: Asynchronous eDP panel power off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yun1uux7np8.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:57:39 -0700
From:	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
To:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/21] drm/i915: Asynchronous eDP panel power off

On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:55:24 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:

> If it's not too annoying to do, can you move this to the previous patch?
> Dito for the s/panel_vdd_work/panel_work/.

Yeah, that was a bit of sloppy patch mangling.

> Same comment as in the previous patch: I think the
> intel_dp->want_panel_power check belongs into the work queue. We don't
> want to hide the fact that we properly handle that race ;-)

Oh, I see your point. Yeah, either the check needs to be moved, or the
function name changed. I'll move the check.

-- 
keith.packard@...el.com

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped