linux-kernel - Re: [159/244] ipc/mqueue.c: fix mq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3742f425-ad48-4496-8281-5c76eda8b1af@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:54:12 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [159/244] ipc/mqueue.c: fix mq_open() return value

----- Original Message -----
> Sorry, I can't do that, it's against the rules for -stable (see
> Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt).
> 
> Just get your patch into Linus's tree soon, and all should be good,
> right?

Actually, I wasn't referring to mine, I was referring to the one I NAKed
when I was still under the (mistaken) impression that it was only in
for-next and not in Linus' tree.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
              GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
	      http://people.redhat.com/dledford

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/