[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP=VYLoycp1aUYGxQkb+U70CFRvu=nz6pdd63Zapn7a-+gXWVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:40:59 -0400
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (avr32 allnoconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/pio.c: In function 'pio_probe':
> arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/pio.c:401: error: 'THIS_MODULE' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> Probably revealed by the module.h split up. I guess it needs export.h
> included.
Since export.h does not exist for most people, I'm OK adding it
in instances like this as a post-merge patch. For instances where
it is obvious that the full module.h is required, I'd rather the originator
of the new module dependent code simply add the required module.h
themselves. (I think this is consistent with what Stephen has been
recommending to people on a case-by-case basis anyway).
I can/will temporarily add the module.h cases to the post-merge queue
too, but my intention is to move as many of these post-merge commits
off to the sub-maintainers as possible.
P.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists