[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317493763.4588.70.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:29:22 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: w@....eu, greg@...ah.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel.org status: hints on how to check your machine for
intrusion
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 14:13 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 14:06:41 -0400
>
> > For my machine that is connected to the outside world, I have a script
> > that runs every night that checks for attacks. As bots constantly look
> > for port 22 and 80, they find my machine without issue. When my script
> > detects a bunch of ssh login attempts that fail, it will add that ip
> > address to the iptables DROP chain:
>
> By running sshd on a different port, you'll avoid the login attempts
> as well as the overhead of the successful connection attempts.
>
> I haven't allowed sshd to run on port 22 in more than 10 years.
I use to do that a long time ago, but I ran into issues because of it.
Can't remember the exact problem. Maybe it was places I went to that did
not allow outgoing connections to non official ports. Whatever it was,
it was annoying enough to put sshd back to 22.
I probably can go back to a non 22 port without much issue. I have added
a bunch of personal checks to this box that gives a report every day. I
may add more (from what was posted in this thread already). I also have
logwatch and rkhunter running, and just added chkrootkit now.
But moving the ssh port again may be a good idea. But I like stressing
your net filtering code ;)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists