[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4x=F41Fbsw9gB3y=Vzyhf8a9yXB=sd6xbxSNUbTAYdjOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 11:05:42 +0800
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, rmk@....linux.org.uk,
DL-SHA-WorkGroupLinux <workgroup.linux@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api
2011/10/1 Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>:
> On 30 September 2011 12:13, Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> i support we can update dma_data_direction to: MEM_TO_MEM,
>> MEM_TO_DEV, DEV_TO_MEM, DEV_TO_DEV.
>>
> So basically you are suggesting to replace 'enum dma_data_direction'
> with 'enum xfer_direction'
> I am not sure about that. I think they represent different things and
> hence should be separate.
> dma_data_direction tells the mapping of a buffer while the other
> tells if the src and dst are memory or a device's FIFO.
>
you are kind of right now. now people use dma_data_direction to do
mapping for dma buffer. even with all 4 direction, people still use
the old two direction to do mapping. For example, it can't use
MEM_TO_MEM to map, it still need to know whether the memory is source
or dest.
i just don't like to the two old macro names. it seems i get a ticket
flying from New York to Beijing, but actually, we fly to Mexico...
so by the moment, dma_data_direction seems just to mean how to do map,
but xfer_direction is the real transfer direction.
How could we have two macro names: SRC_MEM, DEST_MEM for mapping. or just add:
dma_map_single_src
dma_map_single_dst
...
Thanks
barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists