lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 07:41:09 +0200 From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> To: "Tadeus (Eus) Prastowo" <0x657573@...glemail.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Priority Inheritance] SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR? On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 21:12 +0200, Tadeus (Eus) Prastowo wrote: > Anyone familiar with the Linux scheduler, please? > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Tadeus (Eus) Prastowo > <0x657573@...glemail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > When a SCHED_RR task with RT priority X blocks on a > > priority-inheriting mutex held by a SCHED_NORMAL task with nice value > > Y, RT-Mutex code will change the SCHED_NORMAL task priority to that of > > the SCHED_RR task and based on the new priority, will change the > > scheduling class too. But, each task retains its own scheduling > > policy. > > > > This means that the task inheriting the SCHED_RR priority will be > > scheduled using SCHED_FIFO policy because task_tick_rt does not > > enforce the SCHED_RR time slice when the task policy is not SCHED_RR. > > > > Why should a SCHED_NORMAL task inheriting the priority of a SCHED_RR > > task get the privilege of SCHED_FIFO task for running as long as it > > wishes even when the task giving the inheritance does not have such > > privilege? Existence of a critical section > slice would be the real problem, no? -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists