[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E88AB2C.60804@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 11:19:24 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: kernel.org status: establishing a PGP web of trust
On 10/02/2011 11:14 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> You probably know enough people (including myself) that would be willing
>> to sign your key over the phone. That's part of giving yourself
>> sufficient time.
>
> Well, then I propose that people create two new key pairs instead of
> just one and take both of them to the KS for signing. Afterwards, one
> of them will be used for development and the other one's private key
> will be kept in a safe place (without any online access), so it can be
> used readily if the first pair is lost or compromised somehow.
>
> Perhaps the second pair should have a longer life time.
>
Yes, this is actually a very good practice (the long-lived key should be
a sign-only key, for what it's worth.) I didn't propose it because I
thought it would be too much work.
What do people think? It might be more important for people who are
physically isolated.
>>> What number of signatures on the key will be regarded as sufficient?
FWIW, the stock PGP web of trust rules require 3 signatures.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists