[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111002033110.GA24099@roll>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 23:31:10 -0400
From: tmhikaru@...il.com
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: tmhikaru@...il.com, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel.org status: hints on how to check your machine for
intrusion
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 07:26:43PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 09:58:38PM -0400, tmhikaru@...il.com wrote:
> > Any way we could get something like this verification done for the
> > 3.0.x stable kernels? I'm currently stuck without any way known to me to
> > verify that any of the patches I downloaded from kernel.org before it went
> > down are actually correct.
>
> I already sent a signed copy of the 3.0.4 patch that applies on top of
> the 3.0 kernel to the linux-kernel mailing list a few days ago.
>
> That should be fine for what you need right now, right?
>
> greg k-h
I completely missed that message. I can use that, thank you very
much for pointing it out.
Tim McGrath
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists