[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111002195023.GC31799@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 12:50:23 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] Freezer, CPU hotplug, x86 Microcode: Fix task
freezing failures
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 12:35:04AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> So, this patch addresses this issue by ensuring that microcode is not freed
> from kernel memory, nor invalidated when a CPU goes offline. Thus once the
> kernel gets the microcode during boot-up, it will never have to depend on
> userspace ever again to get microcode, since it never releases the copy it
> already has. So every run of the microcode callback for CPU online event will
> now succeed irrespective of whether userspace is frozen or not. As a result,
> this fixes the task freezing failure encountered while running CPU hotplug
> stress test along with suspend/resume operations simultaneously.
I'm not familiar with how microcode is supposed to be managed but is
it impossible for the newly hotplugged CPU (an actual hot unplug /
plug) may not like the microcode loaded for the previous CPU? Isn't
that why CPU_DEAD was invalidating the microcode?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists