linux-kernel - Re: kernel.org status: establishing a PGP web of trust

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 2 Oct 2011 15:54:34 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
CC:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: kernel.org status: establishing a PGP web of trust

On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 02:36:05PM -0400, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/02/11 04:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 02, 2011, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> On 10/01/2011 06:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>
> >>> OK, I'm taking this as "5 years is fine by us". :-)
> >>>
> >>> And the recommended procedure for rotating keys seems to be (1) generate
> >>> a new key and (2) make as many people as you can sign it before the old
> >>> one expires, right?
> >>>
> >>
> >> (3) revoke the old key with a status code of "no longer in use", or just
> >> let it expire.
> >>
> >>>> Some people have decided to opt for an unlimited key, but that
> >>>> *requires* that you have a way to revoke the old key, which is why we
> >>>> are considering a key revocation escrow service.
> >>>
> >>> That service will be necessary anyway in case some keys are lost or
> >>> compromised.
> >>>
> >>> I wonder what the procedure of restoring kernel.org access in case one
> >>> has lost keys is supposed to be?
> >>
> >> Get a new key and get it re-signed.
> > 
> > Hmm.  That doesn't seem very practical if someone doesn't live close
> > to any other core kernel developers.
> > 
> > What number of signatures on the key will be regarded as sufficient?
> > 
> >> We can work out specific details at KS.
> > 
> > Well, the KS is going to be busy time this year I suppose. :-)
> > 
> > What about people who haven't been invited to the KS?
> 
> They (we) should start building a web of trust with local key signings.
> I'm already working on that in Portland, Oregon.
> 
Anyone in Silicon Valley looking for key signings, please get in touch.

Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/