[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201110020304.28288.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 03:04:28 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: kernel.org status: establishing a PGP web of trust
On Sunday, October 02, 2011, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/01/2011 02:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > OK, how long should the new key be valid?
> >
>
> That is a good question. At the very least you want it to be valid for
> long enough that you will be able to get enough signatures on a new key
> *before* your old key expires. As such I would recommend 3-5 years
> depending on how much you trust yourself to keep the key secure.
OK, I'm taking this as "5 years is fine by us". :-)
And the recommended procedure for rotating keys seems to be (1) generate
a new key and (2) make as many people as you can sign it before the old
one expires, right?
> Some people have decided to opt for an unlimited key, but that
> *requires* that you have a way to revoke the old key, which is why we
> are considering a key revocation escrow service.
That service will be necessary anyway in case some keys are lost or
compromised.
I wonder what the procedure of restoring kernel.org access in case one
has lost keys is supposed to be?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists