[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E886F77.9000909@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:04:39 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"ying.huang@...el.com" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"jeremy@...p.org" <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [V6][PATCH 4/6] x86, nmi: add in logic to handle multiple events
and unknown NMIs
On 10/02/2011 03:48 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Second, I wanted to use NMIs as a way of waking up a vcpu sleeping with
> > interrupts disabled (in the context of Jeremy's paravirt spinlock
> > patches). Looks like we'll have to use paravirtualization for that.
>
> Just use a mode of perf that doesn't use NMIs.
> Interrupt off profiling is rarely needed if at all on modern kernels.
I tend to agree. But that's not my call.
(note 'perf kvm' will need adjustment if we make that change - likely
need to capture the interrupt during vmexit and dispatch it manually;
not sure if it's workable for svm at all)
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists