[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111003092443.GA16852@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:24:44 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] virtio: blk: Add freeze, restore handlers to
support S4
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:46:46PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Sun) 02 Oct 2011 [11:37:33], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:56:02PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > Delete the vq on the freeze callback to prepare for hibernation.
> > > Re-create the vq in the restore callback to resume normal function.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > index 509760b..9844d2c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > @@ -549,6 +549,19 @@ static void __devexit virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > kfree(vblk);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > > +static int virtblk_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> >
> > What prevents the guest from trying to use the VQ while
> > this is in progress? IF it does, what prevents a crash?
>
> An oversight: Sasha pointed this out, too, and I've now fixed this by
> adding a call to vdev->config->reset() before deleting vqs.
>
> Amit
This stops the host from accessing the VQ, but does not stop the *guest*.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists