[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1443629.oeLM18uNcs@wuerfel>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:49:15 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, "Avinash.H.M" <avinashhm@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/30] ARM: omap2+: fix building without i2c
On Sunday 02 October 2011 19:31:25 Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Nice catch. I think the bug is different, though. omap_i2c_reset should
> never be NULL: that code is intended to execute even when
> CONFIG_I2C_OMAP=n. The idea is to prevent the IP block from interfering
> with the rest of the kernel even if the driver is not compiled in, no
> matter how the bootloader or previous OS programmed the IP block.
>
> I'd suggest something like the following patch instead.
>
>
> - Paul
>
> From: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
> Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 19:15:10 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: omap2+: fix build breakage when CONFIG_I2C_OMAP=n
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile incorrectly skips compilation of the I2C
> IP block reset code when CONFIG_I2C_OMAP=n. Fix by unconditionally
> compiling arch/arm/mach-omap2/i2c.o, which is needed on all OMAP2+ platforms.
>
> Problem noted by Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>.
Ok, looks better. You should also drop patch 6 "ARM: omap: fix build with
CONFIG_I2C_OMAP disabled" then.
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists