[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317636215.12973.16.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:03:35 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, pavel@....cz,
len.brown@...el.com, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ashok.raj@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CPU hotplug, freezer: Fix bugs in CPU hotplug call path
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 01:14 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> +static atomic_t tasks_frozen = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> +
> +void set_tasks_frozen_flag(void)
> +{
> + atomic_set(&tasks_frozen, 1);
> +}
> +
> +void clear_tasks_frozen_flag(void)
> +{
> + atomic_set(&tasks_frozen, 0);
> +}
> +
> +int tasks_are_frozen(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + ret = atomic_read(&tasks_frozen);
> + return ret;
> +}
What's the point of using atomic_t here? Neither set nor read are
actually atomic ops.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists