linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] ASoC: samsung: wm8994 depends on mfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111003140824.GM3731@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:08:24 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
	'Jassi Brar' <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 'Liam Girdwood' <lrg@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ASoC: samsung: wm8994 depends on mfd_wm8994

On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 03:43:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> > You've not sent a seprate patch for that one yet...

> I wasn't sure any more which version you wanted. Is this this right one?

I was expecting something that selects the core.  I was also expecting
something that can be applied against -next which this patch can't be,
this doesn't feel like something we should be rushing into 3.1.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/