[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1110031709230.31654@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 17:11:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm00@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
hongjiu.lu@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH v2] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled
(was Re: [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization
disabled)
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > Perhaps another check here for randomize? Something like:
> > >
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM)
> > > if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
> > > load_bias = 0;
> > > else if (vaddr)
> > > load_bias = 0;
> > > else
> > > load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE);
> > > #else
> > > load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > If that's stupid, then feel free to tell me. I won't pretend like I
> > > understand what is going on here yet, but based on the explanation you
> > > provided that might work.
> >
> > I have just verified my hunch that the original patch from H.J. / Josh
> > breaks ASLR completely, so Andrew, please drop it for now.
>
> Yes, please drop the original.
Thanks.
> > I am now looking into how to fix things properly.
> >
> > Josh, looking at what you are proposing -- do you see any reason to make
> > the behavior different in #else branch and in !(current->flags &
> > PF_RANDOMIZE) case?
>
> I was mostly just trying to adapt H.J.'s patch to account for the
> PF_RANDOMIZE case. Looking at it a bit more, I'm not sure why they
> would need to be different. H.J., do you recall why you made that
> change originally?
How about the patch below instead? It survives my testing, and I believe
it handles both cases properly.
Confirmation from the original bug reporter would obviously be a nice
bonus too :)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: fix PIE execution with randomization disabled
The case of address space randomization being disabled in runtime through
randomize_va_space sysctl is not treated properly in load_elf_binary(),
resulting in SIGKILL coming at exec() time for certain PIE-linked binaries
in case the randomization has been disabled at runtime prior to calling
exec().
Handle the randomize_va_space == 0 case the same way as if we were not
supporting .text randomization at all.
Based on original patch by H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@...el.com> and
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
---
fs/binfmt_elf.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
index dd0fdfc..bb11fe4 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
@@ -795,7 +795,10 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct pt_regs *regs)
* might try to exec. This is because the brk will
* follow the loader, and is not movable. */
#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM)
- load_bias = 0;
+ if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
+ load_bias = 0;
+ else
+ load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
#else
load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists