linux-kernel - Re: taskstats root only breaking iotop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzW-E7=Mgtm7uUWLh7GtTxmkWWLpwc9CcWqG3vgVtOHTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:20:33 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Cc:	Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Subject: Re: taskstats root only breaking iotop

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>
> Namespaces came in later, much later after taskstats. I think your
> biased and not even thinking about your bias.

Umm. Yes, I'm biased. I'm biased as hell by the fact that I reported
the taskstats namespace breakage with a suggested approach to fix it,
and never heard back from anybody involved with it.

And yes, you were cc'd on that.

> What was badly designed?

The fact that it had no security what-so-ever? Unlike /proc, which at
least has the *structure* for security, even if it then often for
historical reasons leaves things a bit too open.

                           Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/