[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317656613.3375.78.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:43:33 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@...uge.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Signal scalability series
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 08:28 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:
> >
> > You and me both. Unfortunately, the ia64 guys had a different opinion,
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ia64/msg08363.html
>
> Well, considering that it apparently slows down the single-threaded
> case by 50% on an architecture that actually *matters*, I think the
> whole discussion is somewhat academic, don't you?
>
> "Scalability" is pretty much never a valid excuse for "slows down the
> common case".
Where did you get the 50% slow down figure from?
Oh, are you referring to Oleg's email about the slow down under kvm?
Yeah, admittedly that's a pretty clear indicator that something is wrong
with the approach in this patch series.
I thought I'd replied to that email but I guess not.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists