linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJe_ZhfS=4vSS0OiSuNx3S+fW8R4-=khrHtt8suLeHjTFYBVeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:49:43 +0530
From:	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
To:	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
	DL-SHA-WorkGroupLinux <workgroup.linux@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api

On 3 October 2011 21:43, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 11:54:23AM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On 2 October 2011 06:03, Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com> wrote:
>> > 2011/10/2 Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
>>
>> >> > For example, it can't use
>> >> > MEM_TO_MEM to map, it still need to know whether the memory is source
>> >> > or dest.
>> >> MEM_TO_MEM means "From Memory Source To Memory Destination"
>> >>  Map Src buffer with DMA_TO_DEVICE and Dst buffer with DMA_FROM_DEVICE
>> >>
>> >> MEM_TO_DEV means "From Memory Source To FIFO Destination"
>> >>  Map Src buffer with DMA_TO_DEVICE.
>> >>
>> >> DEV_TO_MEM means "From FIFO Source To Memory Destination"
>> >>  Map Dst buffer with DMA_FROM_DEVICE
>> >>
>> >> DEV_TO_DEV means "From FIFO Source To FIFO Destination"
>> >>
>> >> What else would you want to know ?
>> >
>> > that is the problem. for example, drivers can't use MEM_TO_MEM as a
>> > flag to do dma mapping. so xfer_direction can't cover all that
>> > dma_data_direction can do.  that's why you need both
>> > dma_data_direction and xfer_direction with some similar flags in them.
>> >
>> The client drivers map the src/dst buffers and the dmac driver unmaps
>> them by default(!). For which, the dmac driver doesn't look at anything
>> other than
>>      DMA_COMPL_SKIP_SRC/DST_UNMAP
>>      DMA_COMPL_SRC/DST_UNMAP_SINGLE
>>   bits of 'enum dma_ctrl_flags'.
>> For this unmap'ing purpose, the usage of dma_data_direction is already
>> internal to the dmac driver.
>
> No.  Slave DMA engine drivers do *not* (and if they do, they should *not*)
> honour the unmapping of submitted buffers.
>
> The unmapping of these buffers by the DMA engine driver is intended to be
> done for the async_tx API and not slave DMA.
>
The proposed api is usable by both Slave as well as Async(Memcpy etc).
So it *does* matter here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/