linux-kernel - Re: Re: BUG in kernel: Wrong Handling of USB HDD’s in scsiglue(slave_configure) and scsi/sd(sd_read_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1110031408420.1882-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date:	Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:10:53 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
cc:	Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@...il.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Re: BUG in kernel: Wrong Handling of USB HDD’s in scsiglue(slave_configure) and scsi/sd(sd_read_cache_type)

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Douglas Gilbert wrote:

> The RBC device parameters mode page followed by a Power
> Condition mode page. The RBC device parameters mode page
> is the only SCSI page I have seen (mode, log, VPD, etc)
> with a 5 byte field!
> 
> Decoded response to a probable MODE SENSE(6) "fetch all
> pages" command:
>    RBC device parameters mpage:
>      WCD=0 [double negative: write cache enabled]
>      Logical block size: 512 bytes
>      Number of logical blocks: 0x12A19EB0 *** [160 GB]
>      Power/performance: 0x3c
>      READD: 0 [READ enabled]
>      WRITED: 0 [WRITE enabled]
>      FORMATD: 0 [FORMAT UNIT enabled]
>      LOCKD: 1 [media cannot be locked]
>    Power Condition mpage:
>      IDLE=0
>      STANDBY=1
>      IDLE_CONDITION_TIMER=0
>      STANDBY_CONDITION_TIMER=0xbb8 [300 seconds]
> 
> References: rbc-r10a.pdf [1999] + spc3r26 [2005]
> 
> Hopefully Seagate will switch to UAS(P) in the near future.
> 
> 
> *** That is _not_ the address of the last valid LB as in
>      the SCSI READ CAPACITY command!

Thanks for the explanation.

> > Would it make sense to assume write caching is present and enabled if
> > the drive does not provide a Caching page?
> 
> No. You need to also take into account the RBC
> device parameters mode page if present. See above.

All right, suppose neither page is present.  Does it then make sense to 
assume by default that write caching is enabled?

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/