[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111003192424.GB30091@phenom.oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:24:24 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jan Glauber <jang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V2 2/5] stop_machine: make stop_machine
safe and efficient to call early
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 02:55:34PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
>
> Make stop_machine() safe to call early in boot, before SMP has been
> set up, by simply calling the callback function directly if there's
> only one CPU online.
>
> [ Fixes from AKPM:
> - add comment
> - local_irq_flags, not save_flags
> - also call hard_irq_disable() for systems which need it
>
> Tejun suggested using an explicit flag rather than just looking at
> the online cpu count. ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/stop_machine.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
> index ba5070c..9c59d9e 100644
> --- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
> +++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct cpu_stopper {
> };
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_stopper, cpu_stopper);
> +static bool stop_machine_initialized = false;
__read_mostly?
Thought it probably does not really matter that much in what section it
is put in.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists