[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1110032229250.1489@ionos>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 22:35:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: xen: IPI interrupts not resumed early enough on suspend/resume
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 19:42 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > I can see a few options for how I might go about solving this in a
> > > non-hacky way, which approach do you think would be preferable:
> >
> > The question is whether you need to disable the IPI interrupt at
> > all. If not, we have a flag for that.
>
> We already that flag for these (I think that was why it was added even).
> The issue is that in the resuming domain on the other side event
> channels all start off masked and something needs to unmask them.
Bah.
> > > * Add "IRQF_RESUME_EARLY", driven from syscore_resume, and use it
> > > for these interrupts.
> >
> > That's the preferable solution, as we could use that for PPC as well,
> > unless we can move stuff around, so we disable stuff later.
>
> OK
I guess we should go down that road then.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists